For long-lasting rhinoplasty, is it better to use silicone or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)?
Disease description:
I have recently been considering undergoing rhinoplasty and hope to achieve long-lasting results. While researching online, I came across recommendations for silicone implants as well as suggestions for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). I don't know much about these two materials. Could you please explain the advantages and disadvantages of each for those seeking long-term rhinoplasty results, and which one would you recommend?
Doctor's answer (1)
Dr. Chen Lu
For patients seeking long-lasting results, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) materials may be a better option, as they can integrate more effectively with human tissue and offer better stability.
In the field of plastic surgery, rhinoplasty is a common cosmetic procedure aimed at improving the appearance of the nose. Silicone and expanded materials are two commonly used implant materials, each with its own characteristics. Silicone implants are widely used due to their stability and relatively lower cost. They offer good biocompatibility, are less prone to infection, and have a fixed shape that is easy to carve, making them suitable for patients seeking a natural appearance. However, silicone implants may experience displacement or show light transmission over time, which can affect aesthetics. Expanded materials, such as polytetrafluoroethylene, offer better tissue compatibility and can bond more closely with surrounding tissues, reducing the risk of implant displacement. However, expanded materials are more expensive, and if infection occurs, management can be more complex.
Patients should make informed decisions based on their individual circumstances and needs, under the guidance of a qualified physician. Postoperative care is also important to avoid complications and prolong the duration of the rhinoplasty results.
