Which is more effective for heatstroke: drinking water or intravenous fluid administration?
Generally speaking, for patients with heat stroke, whether drinking water or intravenous (IV) fluid administration is more effective depends on the specific circumstances. When the condition is mild and the patient is conscious, drinking water may be more appropriate. However, if the condition is severe and accompanied by impaired consciousness, IV fluid administration is usually more effective. Detailed analysis is as follows:
When the patient's condition is mild, the patient is conscious, and there are no significant symptoms such as vomiting or difficulty swallowing, replenishing fluids and electrolytes by drinking water is feasible. At this time, the patient can drink electrolyte-containing water in small amounts frequently, gradually alleviating the body's dehydration status and helping to restore physical strength.
If the patient's heat stroke is severe, accompanied by confusion, frequent vomiting, or inability to swallow independently, IV fluid administration is often more effective. Intravenous fluids can rapidly replenish water and electrolytes, correct internal imbalances, avoid risks such as choking or aspiration caused by drinking water, and provide time for subsequent treatment.
To prevent heat stroke, preventive measures should be taken in advance in high-temperature environments, such as avoiding prolonged exposure to direct sunlight, ensuring indoor ventilation, and regularly replenishing diluted salt water. Once symptoms of heat stroke appear, an appropriate hydration method should be selected according to the patient's condition, and the patient should be sent to the hospital for professional medical treatment as soon as possible.