Which is more serious: gallbladder polyps or gallstones?
In general, it is not possible to directly determine whether gallbladder polyps or gallstones are more serious, as both conditions can be benign and low-risk in some cases, yet both also carry the potential to cause severe complications. The key factor lies in the specific characteristics of the lesion and whether complications have developed. A detailed analysis is as follows:
From the perspective of risk, gallstones pose a more immediate threat. Most gallstones are asymptomatic, but some may block bile ducts and trigger acute cholecystitis. If stones obstruct the common bile duct, they can lead to acute cholangitis or biliary pancreatitis. These acute conditions, if not treated promptly, may become life-threatening. In contrast, the primary risk associated with gallbladder polyps is long-term malignant transformation. Most polyps are benign, and those smaller than 1 cm in diameter have an extremely low risk of cancer. However, polyps ≥1 cm in diameter, broad-based, or showing rapid growth over a short period carry a significantly increased risk of malignancy. Once gallbladder cancer develops, the prognosis is very poor.
From a clinical management standpoint, small asymptomatic gallstones typically require only regular monitoring, while symptomatic or high-risk stones necessitate surgical removal. For polyps smaller than 1 cm, follow-up ultrasound examinations every 6–12 months are recommended. Polyps ≥1 cm or those exhibiting high-risk features should be surgically removed promptly to prevent malignant transformation.
Both gallbladder polyps and gallstones can potentially lead to serious health issues. The critical factors are early detection, early diagnosis, and timely treatment. Patients who experience related symptoms or are found to have gallbladder stones or polyps during routine check-ups should seek medical attention promptly. A qualified physician can then develop an appropriate treatment plan based on the individual's specific condition.