Which is better, neratinib or pyrotinib?
Generally speaking, neratinib and pyrotinib do not have an absolute distinction in terms of superiority. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer should choose based on their specific condition and tolerance. If there are concerns, it is recommended to consult a healthcare provider in advance. The detailed analysis is as follows:

For patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who have previously received adjuvant trastuzumab therapy and require extended adjuvant treatment, or for those with advanced disease that has progressed after trastuzumab-based therapy, neratinib may be more appropriate. It provides sustained inhibition of the HER2 pathway and can reduce the risk of recurrence in early-stage patients. However, it may be associated with gastrointestinal side effects such as diarrhea, which requires preventive management.
For patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, especially those whose disease has progressed after multiple anti-HER2 treatments or who are at risk of brain metastases, pyrotinib may offer greater advantages. It has stronger affinity for HER2 and achieves higher concentrations in the brain, enabling better control of brain metastatic lesions. However, some patients may experience adverse reactions such as rash or hand-foot syndrome, requiring close monitoring and dose adjustments.
Prior to selecting either drug, comprehensive HER2 testing and disease evaluation are necessary. During treatment, patients must strictly follow medical instructions and undergo regular monitoring for adverse effects. Any discomfort should be promptly reported to the physician; self-adjusting or discontinuing medication is not recommended to ensure safe and effective therapy.