Is there a noticeable difference before and after tear trough filling?
The before-and-after comparison of tear trough filling is quite noticeable. Not only does the tear trough area become smoother, but the overall appearance also looks younger. However, because individuals choose different filling methods, the degree of visible improvement varies, such as with injectable fillers, surgical filling, or combined approaches. The details are as follows:
1. Injectable Filling
This method is generally suitable for mild tear troughs. After injecting hyaluronic acid or autologous fat, some swelling may occur, but it typically subsides within 3–5 days. At that point, the results become apparent. However, since the original tear trough was not severe, the before-and-after difference is relatively subtle.
2. Surgical Filling
For moderate to severe tear troughs, a surgical approach can be used. Through either an internal or external incision, orbital septum fat is released and repositioned to fill the depression. Once the transplanted tissue stabilizes, the tear trough naturally disappears. The postoperative outcome is highly noticeable, resulting in a dramatic improvement compared to the preoperative condition.
3. Combined Filling
This approach combines the two methods mentioned above and is more suitable for severe tear troughs. If the surgical filling alone does not achieve optimal correction, additional injections of hyaluronic acid or autologous fat may be needed to enhance the result. With this combined method, the before-and-after contrast is also very evident.
There will definitely be a difference before and after tear trough filling—only the extent of the improvement varies. It is recommended that patients choose reputable plastic surgery clinics, select the most appropriate treatment method for their individual needs, and undergo the procedure under the guidance of qualified medical professionals to avoid adverse reactions.