
Which is better for hernia surgery: minimally invasive or traditional open surgery?
Suffering from a hernia is really distressing and very uncomfortable. Doctor, is it better to have a minimally invasive surgery or a traditional open surgery for hernia?

The choice between minimally invasive and conventional surgery for hernia mainly depends on the patient's specific condition and surgical needs.
Minimally invasive surgery (e.g., laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair) offers advantages such as reduced trauma, faster postoperative recovery, lower recurrence rate, and better cosmetic outcomes. It is particularly suitable for patients in good physical condition who can tolerate general anesthesia. Minimally invasive surgery involves smaller incisions and less postoperative pain, allowing for quicker recovery and a relatively lower recurrence rate. However, it is more expensive and technically demanding, requiring surgeons with advanced skills and experience.
In comparison, conventional surgery (e.g., traditional open repair) involves larger incisions and a longer recovery period, but it is less costly and may be more appropriate for patients who are older or have compromised cardiopulmonary function and cannot tolerate general anesthesia. Conventional surgery involves a larger incision in the groin area, making the procedure more straightforward. However, patients may experience postoperative pain, swelling, and abdominal discomfort.
The selection of the specific surgical approach should be made under the guidance of a qualified surgeon.