Which is better for pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation: devices or manual therapy?
After childbirth, the pelvic floor muscles may require rehabilitation. Whether using instruments or manual techniques, both approaches aim to deliver electrophysiological stimulation to the muscles to restore their function. Therefore, there is no significant difference between the two methods. Both manual therapy and instrument-assisted therapy constitute forms of pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training. In practice, a combination of both instrumental and manual approaches is typically employed for comprehensive rehabilitation.

Many new mothers do not perceive any issues with their pelvic floor muscles immediately after delivery. However, without postpartum rehabilitation, symptoms such as constipation and urinary incontinence may gradually emerge—and worsen—with advancing age; severity varies among individuals. Pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation—whether performed manually or with specialized pelvic floor devices—primarily involves two modalities: biofeedback therapy and electrical stimulation therapy. Both techniques effectively strengthen the pelvic floor muscles, enhance neuromuscular activation, and restore voluntary contraction capacity, thereby promoting overall pelvic floor recovery.

Ultimately, these interventions help alleviate symptoms such as constipation and urinary incontinence. Thus, regardless of the chosen method—including self-performed Kegel exercises—all approaches target pelvic floor muscle contraction and functional recovery, achieving the desired therapeutic outcomes.